SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 225.18-1.5%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: StanX Long who wrote (4753)1/6/2003 3:47:41 AM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (2) of 25522
 
re: equipment life span

My (outsider's) impression is, the lifespan of any given piece of equipment in a fab, is infinitely flexible.

If consumers and corporate IT budgets have money to burn, and are all demanding the latest/fastest/biggest, then equip lifespan gets compressed.

But in current conditions, corporations and consumers can get by with their current PC/cellphone/server/etc., pretty much indefinitely, which means current installed equip in fabs can satisfy demand indefinitely. Well, with about 500M-1B/month in tech orders (no capacity orders) for semi-equip (1996, 1998, and 2002 trough levels).

There is no particular reason that everyone has to replace/upgrade their cellphones every year (rather than every other year), or their PC every 4 years (rather than in 5 or 6 or X years).

What I'm saying is, it has nothing to do with the technology, and everything to do with macro economic conditions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext