Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zonder who wrote (1797)	1/6/2003 9:59:17 AM
From: William B. Kohn	Read Replies (1) of 15987

Courts of law (military tribunals) have held that these people do not fall under the GC. Other provisions of the GC have different definitions of who and who is not covered. We disagree here, as I said we will not change each others minds. Best bet, get your Euro-buddies to take us to the Hague for the terrible acts we are doing. We don't disregard the GC, we read it differently. The convention is not something read, one sentence at a time, but as a document in its totality. About the dollar, interesting BUT I still don't see how the US fairs worse than the other major currencies. I think the real estate bubble you are alluding to is minor if it exists at all. I think the economic problems of the US relative to debt are trivial compared to the problems with debt we faced in the early ninties. I still see more problems in Europe and in Japan. I believe that the dollar will bottom shortly if it hasn't already and will begin to turn itself around, but I'll admit that this may be wishful thinking on my part and not backed up by any technical or fundamental analysis that I can hang my hat on!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next