What and why
Yes but often speaking in plain English is boring.
And consider. If you really wanted to know some one else, their character, their thinking ability, how does one proceed.
In sports that are a slice of life. Technical, tactical, physical and emotional. The fours vector of the equation.
A good understanding of the true meaning of the above vectors provides an amazing clarity into human nature.
Pressure exposes breakdown. Skill is to do with the least amount of expended energy.
I post dozens of messages. Some are clear and obvious and may hold dome deep insight that is suggestive of my thinking or not. Some may be clear or obtuse nonsense. Some may technical language flaws contain.
In my case there is also another record. I have several hundred web pages. They contain thousands of words, hundreds of paragraphs. If the pages are all linked and no link is broken then I have that ability to write appache with a precision perfect syntax that as whole are far more complex than any post here . If the English in all those pages is good, what do we know.
Then you ask, what are the elements of the writing process.
What is the distribution of perfect and not and what associations can one apply to the samples of writing.
It is important to get some writing perfect and in other writing is not so important.
I say based upon samples sizes of perfect and not and rational associations.
One must conclude imperfection is by design or lack of care.
Lack of care is not a sign of ability. It's a conscious decision on resource allocation. How much time does one care to spend on a particular message based upon other tasks that require time.
If one denies there is imperfection and that is false that is a telling flaw. What do I deny and not.
what do observations on my writing reveal about the reviewer
rebuttal to first observation
LOL, no I have fun testing the limits of what pisses people off and keeps them that way.
Who do I test most often times up time to post
An expression is, "pardon my french" Well french to me in this context is not just words, but what I see as the meaning in the words. So if I recieve french, I know it's frech. I return the gift. This has nothing to do with coalitions.
hillary said recently that Republican are racists.
Those who donot believe that was implicit in what she said are naive.
Robert byrd used the term "white nigger" I think anyone who says his use was racist are slow thinking or dishonest.
I really do not now the current heart of Robert Byrd on race. I do believe I know the heart of hillary. That is because in her heart she is a poet of darkness.
So here I have posted a set of examples to illustrate my thinking. The examples are a window into the perspective of my minds eys. It may be a wacky perspective, but it's what God gave me.
on the last line
All are free to read all, some, none of what I write.
Send money and I will entertain your requests. LOL
I do read most posts looking for keys that are fodder for riddles. Often my comments are a composite the what a poster has just said in several posts that may or may not have been to the same person.
I don't read next next. I read conversations often and then provide a comment. I read next next only to find a conversation that is not boring.
If I do research and then comment. Often the comment is meaningless to any who have no understanding of the research. And many never considered there may be unstated reseach that should be obvious to the person getting the message.
And thus there is composite french. Complexity upon Complexity.
With my technical skills and tactical understanding what technique and tactics do I use with skill to achieve what goal. |
