Message 13783845
To:dkgross who wrote (81)
From: Quahog Friday, May 26, 2000 12:13 PM
Respond to of 442
Certain members have more pull with SI Admin than others. That's life I guess. I was suspended for three days for waging a "personal attack" against a certain person whose name begins with "z". The personal attack? I referred to him as a moron...once (well maybe twice). In SI land, the truth is no defense.
---
REPLY TO
---
Message 13783749
To:SI Admin (Bob) who wrote (75)
From: dkgross Friday, May 26, 2000 12:02 PM
View Replies (3) | Respond to of 442
not to be a pain in the ass, but this just seems like overreacting.
Take a look through the ECNC thread from mid March when all hell was breaking loose.
Why were Pluvia and Anthony give total free reign and allowed their personal barage of insults on the ECNC thread without any repremands
Message 18306314
To:scottonstocks who wrote (5036)
From: Quahog Thursday, Dec 5, 2002 7:58 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 5316
Those are serious accusations.
Do you have anything concrete to back it up?
Or are we just supposed to take your word for it?
You have suspicions....great. But do you have evidence? Like so many, you HINT that you have evidence, but this evidence ultimately is never disclosed.
To be clear, you claim that you have documents and records, and have communicated with witnesses that will attest to the fact that SIBob, SI's dismissed board policeman, formed an inappropriate relationship with A@P. You then go on to say flat out that you believe this admin has engaged in serious, criminal activity. Finally, you claim that he is responsible for altering posts of yours.
Again, let's see the proof! Who are the witnesses? Have them come forward. Let's see the documents!
I will go out on a limb and assume that you will claim that you can't make this info public just yet.
So what will it be? Are you a onto the greatest SI conspiracy of all time....
Or are you just another douche with a chip on his shoulder?
Message 18326999
To:David Lawrence who wrote (5082)
From: Quahog Wednesday, Dec 11, 2002 7:34 PM
Respond to of 5316
This is a guy living in a pitifully negative, dream world to rationalize his own failures.
He apparently wants so badly to be a Guru, and just can't accept any personal responsibility for his lack of the necessary charisma, social skills, writing ability or whatever that caused him to fail.
It can't be that he is responsible for his own lot in life. Surely someone else must have caused it. Yeah, that's it. He is so important that others conspired together to cause him ruin. They stayed up late at night concocting schemes to alter his posts to make him look silly.
He is so egotistical that he thinks anyone really cares about his sob story. The fact is that we do care, but only as morbid entertainment when things get otherwise dull. |
