SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : IPPs and Merchant Energy Co.s

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Larry S. who started this subject1/7/2003 7:55:41 PM
From: tom pope  Read Replies (1) of 3358
 
Not earth-shattering, but a straw in the wind:

Federal Crt Dismisses Mkt Manipulation Suit Vs 8 Elec Cos

DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES -- The U.S. District Court of Southern California Monday dismissed a lawsuit against nine electricity suppliers that sought monetary damages for excess power prices caused by alleged market manipulation, according to a copy of court documents seen by Dow Jones Newswires.

The lawsuit was filed last July by the Snohomish County Public Utility District in Washington State against Reliant Resources, Inc. (RRI), PG&E Corp (PCG) unit PG&E Energy Trading, Duke Energy Corp (DUK), Williams Companies (WMB), Xcel Energy, Inc (XEL), Dynegy Inc (DYN), Sempra (SRE), Mirant Corp (MIR) and BC Hydro unit Powerex.

Snohomish accused the power suppliers of conspiring to manipulate power markets by fixing prices and withholding electricity supply, thus driving up electricity prices.

In his order dismissing the case, U.S. District Judge Robert Whaley said the issue of whether and how market manipulation affected rates should be determined by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Snohomish also has complaints pending at FERC, which regulates wholesale power rates.

"Both the monetary and injunctive relief Plaintiff seeks here present direct and specific conflicts with FERC's regulatory authority," Whaley wrote.

Whaley's decision bodes well for other lawsuits pending before the Southern District of California, as well as similar cases pending in the Northern District, said Reliant spokesman Richard Wheatley.

"A similar motion to dismiss is currently pending before Judge (Vaughn) Walker, the judge who is considering the Northern California class action cases," Wheatley said. "We are gratified by Judge Whaley's decision that FERC is the proper authority to deal with these issues."

The Snohomish utility plans to appeal Whaley's decision at the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, said Eric Christensen, associate general counsel for Snohomish County PUD.

A FERC judge issued a ruling last month upholding a disputed contract between Snohomish County PUD and Morgan Stanley (MWD). The decision must be approved by the commission before it's effective.

Snohomish is currently in settlement talks with American Electric Power Co (AEP) over another disputed electric contract, Christensen said.

-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext