EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.000200

+300.1%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mel Spivak who wrote ()	7/21/1996 8:31:00 AM
From: Mel Spivak	of 2383

Harlan you also "got it" on all counts EXCEPT court tampering. 1st Amendments, Free Speech, protects us all on opinions. People can give their opinion that the patent is good or not. When the facts (not opinion) are false or in "reckless disregard of the truth" and are published to others in any medium, the author and publisher are liable for defamation. Liable for damages (actual) and punative (in an amount to deter future defamations of such nature). One would need to know: 1. What was false 2. What a reasonable investigation for the truth would have unvailed What the truth really is 3. And were the "(mis)statements of fact stated in reckless disregard of the truth 4. Were the shareholders of GIFT damaged 5. Should punative damages be awarded given the evidence. That was Defamation 1.01, the case of E-Data vs McGraw-Hill. Mel

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next