SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 259.00+1.7%11:47 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: willcousa who wrote (4857)1/9/2003 11:38:44 PM
From: Fred Levine  Read Replies (3) of 25522
 
I'm glad this is the no-politics thread <vbg>

IMO, there is a huge difference between the wages of a truck driver delivering in the cold (what my father did) and the collecting dividends and getting capital gains (that I occasionally do). Why should my father be taxed at a higher rate than I? Especially since I'm sitting on my ass collecting dividends. Also, labor is the source of all productivity and not the passive investment activity. I cannot understand why capital gains--passive nonproductive activity--gets taxed at a lower rate than wages. Don't we want people to work and we'll all benefit from the labor? In fact, a 100% inheritance tax would enrich the economy by forcing capital either into the economy via gifts or taxes, rather than just accumulate. Several people I know are not working because of inheritances. They are very bright, but also could be productive.

Besides being self-serving to ask the working class, the tax base, to subsidize the rich, it doesn't make either economic or social sense not to tax dividends., inheritances, and capital gains.

fred.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext