SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob who wrote (341307)1/10/2003 10:31:14 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
Re: "The way I read it, it does not matter about loopholes deductions and everything else."

>>> Well then, you've got a mighty funny way of reading things, that ignores practical realities....

>>> 'Cause the 'effective tax rate' (after the impact of all those special interest give-aways and assorted tax loopholes is felt) is way different from the nominal rates.

>>> For example, these are the average effective income tax rates from 1999:

Average American company tax rate - 15%

Average 'Big' company rate - 20%
(over next three years it should be 15% because of the 2001 expanded depreciation schedules)

Average individual tax rate - 14.8%
(up from 13.1% in 1989)

Average rate paid by the '400 richest Americans' (over $110.5 million in annual income) - 22%
(down from 30% in 1995, reduced more than 1/4 by the 1997 changes).

And after the 2001 tax changes are implemented (let alone the '03 proposals) - ????

>>> You get my drift: effective rates are significantly different from nominal rates (which ignore all the loopholes).

>>> Also, as I said, that ridiculous article ignored all the OTHER taxes (sales, property, FICA, etc.) which affect people.

>>> I notice you didn't challenge that.

>>> Show me a restaurant without a sales tax :)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext