Classic TA Workplace Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jjstingray who wrote (63415)	1/10/2003 9:05:02 PM
From: bcrafty	Read Replies (1) of 209892

jj, I'd go back further stockcharts.com[h,a]daclnnay[df][pb50!b200!f][iUb14]&pref=G Something in the 36-40 range would provide a more durable bottom historically on a numerical basis, so I agree with the opinion of JackOfAllTrades. And that number would be between 18-21 on the VIX. There are basically two schools of thought on the VIX and VXN; one says you can't accurately chart the VIX and VXN like stocks and indices and expect the patterns/waves/indicators to work the same way, and the other school says you can. I lean more toward the former and look only at the numerical value at extremes. Even in that case, I have to say that we're close to getting there but not quite yet. I'm giving it at least another week.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next