SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (65432)1/11/2003 2:07:55 PM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Don't know where you read about an attack on the sceptical environmentalist but for your information the report sent out by the Danish committee for honesty in scientific reports said(I translate loosely) that Lomborg, who claims to be a scientist and claims to have used scientific methods, has produced a book(The Sceptical Environmentalist) which is a debate book and not, repeat not, a scientific book. (A debate book is one where only one side of a problem is explained.) As such the committee could not pass judgement on Lomborg's honesty as a scientist. That Lomborg has claimed that his work is scientific and not political at the beginning of the debate and later claimed the reverse is a telling comment on Lomborg's motives.
As for being desperate, try reading the report.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News