SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PartyTime who started this subject1/12/2003 1:03:54 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) of 25898
 
Who Cares?

By David H. Hackworth

Sure, 'First Human Clone,' and 'Lott Heads KKK,' are headlines that get max ink. That's what sells
papers, pumps ratings and keeps the conglomerate cash registers ringing.

But doesn't our news media have a moral responsibility to inform the public about potentially serious
disasters just a sand dune away?

Except for last month's all-too-brief CNN report, followed by an equally brief Associated Press article,
apparently not.

We're only weeks away from sending our troops into the poisonous caldron of Desert Storm II, where
casualties could be as catastrophic as the last time our soldiers stood tall in that unforgiving desert and
suffered at least 160,000 disabled and dying WIA (Wounded in Action) and 10,000 KIABGN (Killed in
Action by Government Neglect).

But the injuries were for the most part self-inflicted, caused by U.S. military incompetence rather than
the sort of horror-filled missiles and shells our soldiers might well run into this time around if and when
we find Saddam's doomsday weapons the hard way.

Concerned members of outfits such as Soldiers for the Truth and the National Gulf War Resource
Center Inc. have done everything but torch themselves into crispy critters to get this story front and
center.

SFTT President Robert McMahon has contacted almost every major news outlet in America, pleading for
coverage. 'Maybe some parents and spouses would like to know that Iraq's Republican Guard won't be
the most insidious enemy their loved ones will be facing,' he wrote.

The 'insidious enemy' McMahon refers to is in part the Iraqi battlefield itself, a death pit of spent
radiation and bio/chem weaponry served up with a lethal cocktail of local bugs, deadly fumes and
poisons that still haven't been fully identified after a decade of medical research. And then there's the
enemy within, the far-from-adequate bio/chem protection and detection gear earmarked for our grunts.

According to one Pentagon report, about 130,000 troops who were downwind when U.S. Army engineers
destroyed a weapons depot were exposed to low levels of sarin. Now epidemiologist Dr. Robert Haley
has published a footlocker full of studies suggesting there might actually be 200,000 Gulf War vets with
illnesses linked to brain damage resulting from exposure to sarin-like toxins. And many vets and
scientists believe other sarin exposures occurred in January 1991 when allied bombs destroyed Iraqi
ammo dumps.

A recent U.S. General Accounting Office report states that 'serious problems still persist' regarding the
protective masks, suits and detection gear. And a December 2002 Army report states that more than
half of its protective masks and nearly all of its chemical-weapons alarms are either 'completely broken
or not fully operational.'

A Pentagon spokeswoman has counterattacked, insisting, 'The Pentagon has substantially improved
individual protective garments, gas masks and chemical detectors since the Gulf War.'

But a line sergeant I'd trust with my life says, 'The only improvement I've seen since the Gulf War is
now that we have the M-40 Protective Mask instead of the M-17A1, we can change our filters without
committing suicide.'

Why won't the media or Congress touch this story when we could be only weeks away from destroying
the lives of another generation of American heroes? Is it the prevailing attitude that war is a nasty
business, but our all-volunteer force signed up for it? Or is it just that no one who could make a
difference cares about what they perceive as blue-collar bio/chem fodder mainly from metropolitan
slums or small-town America?

Maybe the media are displaying such a total lack of interest in whether our GI Joes and Janes will make
it through Saddam's nightmare simply because most haven't served and can't identify with a fighting
force made up of kids who come from poor families with nada political pull in an America that's fast
becoming too much like England circa 1600, a land of serfs and the privileged who sit above the salt.

Kids who are primarily from the wrong side of the railroad tracks where the used pickup trucks are
parked, who didn't go to Yale, Stanford or the other elite schools in between. The same kids who've
filled body bags and been screwed over by Veterans Affairs since the Greatest Generation members
were given their due during and after World War II.

And nothing's going to change until the draft calls up each and every one of America's boys and girls to
defend Old Glory.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext