IMPEACH GRAY DAVIS! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : IMPEACH GRAY DAVIS!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ScotMcI who wrote (196)	1/12/2003 6:37:31 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) of 1641

Yes he could have. He could have let the costs be passed to the consumer (something he ultimately did when it was too late), That seems fairly simplistic to me. Fine if you are talking about mom and pop and their heating bills but what about Bank of America or countless other California corporations? Can these companies afford to pay 5x electric bills and stay online... brown outs aren't really feasible for a multinational corporation... what about cities and municipalities, just jack up their rates and drive some counties into bankruptcy? Can they turn off the electricity to the traffic lights etc? The sad reality is, there are some things in the world such as police and fire protection, utilities/water etc. which are not served well by a free market system particularly when there is fraud on the other side. Maybe people don't agree with what Davis did to handle the crisis, but I certainly can see WHY he did it... his handling of the energy situation is nothing like the budget... in the case of the 2003 budget it was pure negligence and denial that got us into this mess... but the energy situation really had no right answers and you could make a case either way for any outcome. Lizzie

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next