DON'T START THE WAR Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (1216)	1/13/2003 1:31:26 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) of 25898

This crucial legal distinction means that there is no legitimate basis for the trendy comparison between Iraqi and Israeli compliance, or lack of thereof, with U.N. resolutions. It means no such thing. The U.S. routinely vetoes Security Council resolutions that are unfavorable to Israel. The U.S. does not veto anti-Iraq resolutions. That is the difference. . it does appear that there is a potential link between nichols and mcveigh and the possiblity that they were aided and abetted by iraqis and other ME terrorist operatives. As Bush & Co. are frantically looking for any possible excuse to go to war with Iraq, including fabricated links between Saddam and Osama, you tell me they have overlooked this one right under their noses? LOL! Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next