Insulting my intelligence is not doing much to further your argument, either.
Just ignoring the fact that your post/posts are wrong in practically everything they assert hasn't stopped you from making yourself look foolish
I would love to see you try to prove me wrong "in practically everything" but of course you lack the basic scientific knowledge to oppose me on this subject. Isn't that sad? You are reduced to claiming "I am wrong" but cannot say how. And it is me who looks foolish, hm? Right.
You accused me of a false dilemma then failed to provide the proof which should have been so easy since you claim there are so many alternatives.
I told you to look into third law of thermodynamics. That should have been enough, if you know what "entropy" is. If you don't, I guess, and too lazy to look it up, then it would seem to you that I have not said anything in response.
re eternal - are you saying that if something comes to being NOW and is to last FOREVER, it will not be "eternal"?
at least consult a dictionary
OK, let's do that.
eternal
\E*ter"nal\, a. [F. ['e]ternel, L. aeternalis, fr. aeternus. See Etern.]
1. Without beginning or end of existence; always existing.
2. Without end of existence or duration; everlasting; endless; immortal.
3. Continued without intermission; perpetual; ceaseless; constant.
4. Existing at all times without change; immutable.
5. Exceedingly great or bad; -- used as a strong intensive. ``Some eternal villain.''
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.
As you can see, definition number (2) does not say anything about any beginning, while all definitions refer to having no end - i.e. "eternal" has to do with the end, and not necessarily with the beginning. We may talk about something being "eternal" even if it comes into existence today, as long as it will continue to exist forever. |
