Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zonder who wrote (14450)	1/13/2003 7:58:53 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 28931

How a person could derive that point from what you said is a mystery to me. You just don't want to admit you were wrong and now you are making up a bizarre explanation. So, not agreed. The question is not cause but existence. You keep starting with "existent" material. BTW the cause of Hawking's book is Hawking. Are you that dense? Hello??????? Oxygen molecules are not self existent they exist if you believe Hawking, as a result of the Big Bang. Look it up! The Big Bang had to have a cause, and chance BTW is not a cause. I don't think you have the foggiest notion of what Hawking's book is about if you've even read it. You can't even understand a simple sentence correctly. Have you been drinking Fred's Cool-Aide again? You clearly believe in spontaneous generation of mater out of nothing without any cause. That's not science that's delusion. Greg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next