A Jackass, his PAL(indrome), and GOLD Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A Jackass, his PAL(indrome), and GOLD

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mannie who wrote (141)	1/14/2003 10:56:17 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) of 1210

The problem with bankruptcies I have, is that they punish those have run their businesses well. Huh? If they ran the business well it would not be deep in debt, nor would it have extended credit to risky borrowers. I doubt well run businesses would be hurt. Marginal ones would be forced out. Unfortunatley we have ass backwards laws and they proposal is even worse. COF and all the other junk companies that thrive on forcing credit down the throats of unworthy debtors wants laws to protect them ,and they will probably get it. WCOM wnet bankrup, but is still in business with no debt. It can better compete against the others now cause it is debt free. Keeping WCOM's and KM's and S etc in business is driving down profits for the rest. All this seems to be ass backwards. M

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next