Canadian Diamond Play Cafi Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: VAUGHN who wrote (472)	1/14/2003 8:36:23 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) of 16206

You are wrong about the Sobolev criteria. It is VERY definitive statistically. It is I am afraid, very bearish for Misty Lake in the hypothetical matter of "if the sample is bedrock from the pipe". I do not know of such a success ratio for g10/g9 ratios being indicative. Virtually ALL diamonds mines have 14% of their Pyrope with SUBCALIC (not merely G10) chemistry. Fact. HOWEVER, I do not know WHERE these garnets came from!!! are they float? If so, the ONE pyrope in the SUBCALCIC criteria could be VERY significant!!! This changes the whole picture because we could easily get barren pipes flooding the data. As far a mag goes, the convention of colours is very well established, and if they were lows in the centre, they would be marked as such. Still highs could be good pipes. And there were lows in the map. Most pipes I saw in the NWT were actually only Input anomalies and barely visible as mag anomalies or invisible. EC<:-}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next