Oh?? I take it you have lived amongst Islamic Militants?
I had the misfortune of knowing a few, yes. Very briefly, needless to say, as I ran in the other direction as quickly (and discreetly) as humanly possible.
My point was that I have a first-hand experience of the people we are talking about here. We were talking about "understanding the mentality" of Islamic militants, and I am probably at a pretty good position to do, since my perceptions are based not on western media but on years living among them, as well as among the much larger community of "normal" Muslims.
But targeting civilians and taking glory in their deaths is plainly out of step with civilized protocols.
I completely agree. It is not humane and nor is it "civilized".
Ghandi was able to achieve the independence of a far larger nation without having to call for suicide bombings, or even the use of violence.
Considering just how rare it is for a true visionary like Gandhi to prowl this earth, I would settle with more mediocre people analysing the situation and coming up with more conventional solutions.
Thus, non-violent resistance would likely have achieved for the Palestinians long ago, what decades of terrorism and struggle have not.
This is an interesting view. What effective and non-violent resistance do you feel they could have carried out?
I submit to you, and everyone else, that the Palestinians would likely have either a state, or considerable autonomy RIGHT NOW, were it not for Arafat and his pursuit of violence.
I agree with you that Palestinians would rather have a state right now, and that is why I have more than once pointed out that the best way to combat terrorism would be to cut off support from the average Palestinian by presenting him with hope for a peaceful & prosperous future. By the way, I am not sure if Arafat is the real culprit here... |
