What, you don't think knowingly lying about a company's products when writing reports about them that would benefit you if believed, is criminal? LOL. I KNOW what I've said about Pluvia's report is strong, irrefutable, and proves criminality(evidenced by the fact that neither you nor any of the "others" who have come here to complain to me have been able to offer a single word in actual defense against my charge). He published a lie to benefit his position, and did so knowingly(a key point, if you know anything about the law).
You don't care about truth if your NON-response reply just now is ANY indication("weak," you said. You may as well have not replied at all for all the good it did the case you failed to make. Why weak, huh?). What works for you isn't truth, it's SHEEP FOLLOWERS, and you don't want them to realize that your kind tip-toes around the boundaries of the truth at every turn, sometimes ignoring it, sometimes stepping flat out of it(nay, with each recommendation, IMO). You are too stupid and weak and controlling and scared, to call this spade I've described, the spade it is.
Dan B |
