SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Krowbar who wrote (7081)1/17/2003 10:21:51 AM
From: Ray  Read Replies (2) of 8393
 
Very interesting, Del -- and it confirms what ECD has been saying about the STM work progressing very well.

STM started on OUM development about a year later than Intel did -- and appear to be poised for OUM product introduction about a year or more before Intel's (presently-stated) introduction. As Tyler Lowery said some time back, STM is a "tiger" -- which I took to mean also that Intel is not.

STM is following a philosophy and time-line that I initially thought Intel would follow -- an aggressive development for ASAP OUM product introduction. Later, I decided from their comments, that Intel was staging its efforts from a marketing stance -- that is, they were going to milk more profits from their present flash products before introducing OUM products.

Now that STM is providing a challenge, I imagine Intel will shorten its time-line. From my memory, Intel frequently manages a new product introduction promptly after a competitor introduces a better product -- which means, IMO, that they had the subject product ready to go but held back introduction until necessary. This is probably "good marketing" from the profit standpoint, but it does not qualify them as a "tiger".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext