Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 164.53

-0.4%

Jan 14 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Robert who wrote (31349)	1/17/2003 5:49:44 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) of 197214

Robert, Ben is correct in his interpretaion of the Gartner statement. Gartner means that "political repercussion" is the reason for no roaming revenues .. that the GSM cabal would punish the GSM carrier that would install GSM1x. I don't know why Gartner wasn't explicit .. and forced us to make the inference. Maybe they are afraid of political repercussions themselves. I tried to throw Gartner's "probably more lucrative" conclusion into question .. based purely on economics and technical performance .. ignoring the political viewpoint. My argument would be correct IMHO .. if the threat of political repercussion wasn't reality. I apologize if my post helped lead you down the wrong path. A point that might help you. The CDMA2000 1x RAN may be paired with either IS-41 MAP or GSM MAP core networks. It is called 1x in either case. So there is no point in the GSM1x term .. unless it means a GSM RAN with a 1x RAN overlay. Ron

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next