Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kumar who wrote (66641)	1/17/2003 9:30:25 PM
From: William B. Kohn	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Kumar, When India is attacked by terrorists they strike back. When the UK was attacked by the IRA, they struck back. When Israel is attacked by terrorists they strike back. When the US is attacked we strike back. What's the diff?? Neither the Indians, English, Israeli's or Americans are wrong to avenge the murderous acts against their civilian populations. As far as evidence between Iraq and antiUS terror activity, it is widely reported that Iraq attempted to asassinate a former US president, there are strong links between Iraq and WTC attack I, and no one can deny that Iraq has links to terror organizations associated with the Israeli / Palestinian conflict and that those groups have strong links with Al Quida. As for Iraqi desire or lack thereof for democracy, time will tell. I imagine that it was argued that Germany or Japan was not ready for democracy at the end of WWII. I support aggressive intervention in Iraq. I do not think we can afford to be Chamberlain-like with the weapons available to despots these days. bill@onenorthkoreaisenough.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next