SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Fascist Oligarchs Attack Cute Cuddly Canadians

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (915)1/18/2003 4:30:44 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (2) of 1293
 
The slavers only ever had agreements on lands north of the Nueces, and not all the lands north of the Nueces either .... they broke their word on those agreements anyway, so points raised in that regard are moot ... as are US 'rights' stemming from the TdeGH, which was unilaterally abrogated by the US ... Artículo VIII i mentioned yesterday, well on reviewing it last night recalled that it goes together with Artículo IX ... it's on the net, actually easier to find a non-pdf version in english than it is in spanish .... you cannot put a start and finish date on history, as i mention before, and any reasonably objective and intelligent human being will, on reviewing all facts of the slaver invasion, understand the essence of what happened, which is that the slavers wanted the land, had the numbers and military power to take it, so they took it .... punto

You'd like to justify the genocide of the indígena of this continent ... well, fine - then you may consider my comment to be aiding you in that regard, as i'm clearly pointing out that you have only one line of reasoning for that justification, a point on which you must concentrate, and try to make work for you - that might makes right, that the right of conquest is an absolute right of man, and worthy of the shedding of human blood, even a thing to be encouraged

But you can see where that leads our species, can't you ... or rather, to phrase that more appropriately, fails to lead our species .... escucha otra vez, chaparro -

' 'It's over.' - history is never over ... history goes back a long ways before our species started recording it, hey it goes back a long ways before we even had a species operating on four legs never mind two .... it keeps going, and going, and going, too ... it will keep going even without us, should your presidente blow up the planet ... you keep wanting to put start and finish dates on history, doesn't work that way hijito, no se puede .... as for leaving feuds in the past, hey that's my point - by all means let's do that, and move on ... to accomplish this on the lands of Occupied México, this means recognising the truth, that it was solely a might makes right argument behind the theft of them, no other justification exists .... no point in trying to base a society on a foundation of lies, now is there, better the truth

The indígena of this continent have been here tens of thousands of years, long before any two dozen empires you can name .... we'll be here a long long time yet .... maybe just our bones, but maybe more, maybe our descendants as well - if yours survive, ours will survive, so i suggest you just get used to the presence of brown people with distinct language here, learn to live with it ... not so hard really, millions do and seem to have no problem with it .... you seem to, and the reason why boggles me, i don't know what to say, beyond <shrug> pues chíngate</shrug> '

Message 18459547

By the way, we're screwing your sisters, and your daughters .... so in your struggle with the difficulties of learning to love brown people with warm and charming accents, you may if you wish start with your nephews and/or grandchildren ..... ¡que aproveche!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext