SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Fascist Oligarchs Attack Cute Cuddly Canadians

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marcos who wrote (923)1/18/2003 6:46:39 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) of 1293
 
There was no profanity in that post
Oh yeah?
chíngate

I see you have difficulty with logic and fact. You remind me of Duray, you throw out wild idiotic statements and charges right and left.

So you consider the word and signature of Moses Austin and fellow slaver representatives to be of so little value as to, when given, not constitute one side to an 'agreement'
Perdon, but I am perfectly willing to accept the Treaty of Velasco as valid. That, signed by General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna and David G. Burnet, President of the Republic of Texas, are the only legal documents that have meaning in this matter. It is you who do not accept that treaty.. Your answer was that the Mexican Congreso never ratified it. Fine. Then, because no other treaty was ever ratified between the Republic of Texas and Mexico, then there was no treaty to end that war. The Treaty of Velasco set the southern border of Texas at the Rio Grande. Lacking anything else, the Texans took it as all the had to define the limits of their country.

You wander on endlessly, throwing out crazy charges and rants, because you have no facts on your side.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext