SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Castle

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (968)1/18/2003 9:45:19 PM
From: MSI  Read Replies (2) of 7936
 
And why should she EVER have to give it up?

Contrary to common belief, gov't protections for copyright and patents are not for the benefit of the inventor, commercializing interests, or heirs, but specifically designed to benefit the country and citizenry at large.

The Constitution deems that intellectual property and initial profits are accorded special temporary protection by gov't powers, paid for by the entire country. The purpose of these special protections is to spur further development for public benefit, not create works that are then removed from the public domain forever.

The problem occuring now is being spurred by corp interests, which have arisen to become more represented in gov't than the people. It is the corps who lobby for unlimited ownership rights to intellectual property, depriving the initial Act of its purpose. Corps are immortal, and officers of the larger ones have much greater influence than other citizens. The benefits of corp elimination of the original public right accrue more to the corp and it's largest shareholders, than the public at large.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext