SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
CSCO 76.04-0.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (62732)1/19/2003 12:40:23 PM
From: hueyone  Read Replies (1) of 77400
 
Hi Mindmeld:

You calculate free cash flow (FCF) similar to the way I do---excluding changes in working capital from the definition and starting with net income, although I seem to recall that you used to start your calculation with "net cash provided by operations" rather than with net income. Many folks (possibly most) start their FCF calculation with "net cash provided by operations" from the cash flow statement; hence stock option expense is added back into their final figure (as is the case with Boeing) when stock options are expensed.

Some of these folks that start their calculation with "net cash provided by operations", are using the fact that FCF does not change when options are expensed, as an argument to minimize the importance of expensing stock options, characterizing expensing stock options as largely irrelevant with a refrain along these lines: "Free cash flow does not change, so I don't care what you do with earnings; my company is still growing free cash flow and doing well regardless of whether you expense stock options on the income statement or not".

In my opinion, however, there is a smoking gun that belies these stock options apologists' logic: That is the fact that that a portion of these "overstated" free cash flows often disappears in to share buybacks to counteract share dilution, which in turn reduces retained earnings on the balance sheet. This in turn begs the question: What relevance do these wonderful reported free cash flows have to shareholder wealth building capability when a portion of this reported free cash flow subsequently disappears from retained earnings in an effort to counteract dilution from exercise of stock options?

Mindmeld, while I have some education in finance, I am not an accountant. Feel free to point out any perceived inaccuracies in my thinking and accounting assumptions. However, I am reasonably certain that free cash flow as currently defined, for companies that heavily employ stock options, has very limited applicability as an investment evaluator.

Regards, Huey

P.S. I may have some issues with deducting business acquisitions from free cash flow depending on the situation and the purpose of my calculation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext