SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (2427)1/20/2003 1:07:08 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) of 25898
 
VERY, VERY OFF TOPIC:

Lazarus, as in most cases when it comes to statistics, they're like a bikini--what they show is interesting, but what they reveal is crucial.

My comment regarding Texas and Florida cattle size should have been better qualified. It is in larger herd size, not numbers of cattle, that Florida leads Texas. However, given how Texans like things 'big,' they still could be a bit upset over the statistic.

Here are some USDA figures for two periods of time 1994-1995 and 2000-2001. Yup, Florida's got bigger herds.

Cattle and Calves: Percent of Inventory by Size Group, Selected States, and United States, 2000-2001 1/

Inventory on Operations Having:

1-49 Head 50-99 Head 100-499 Head 500-999 Head 1,000+ Head

2000-2001 2000-2001 2000-2001 2000-2001 2000-2001

FL 11.0 11.0 9.0 8.8 23.0 24.0 13.0 13.2 44.0 43.0
TX 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 29.0 30.0 12.0 11.0 35.0 36.0

1994-1995 1994-1995 1994-1995 1994-1995 1994-1995

FL 11.0 13.0 8.0 7.0 24.0 24.0 13.0 12.0 44.0 44.0
TX 14.0 12.0 11.0 13.0 33.0 31.0 10.0 11.0 32.0 33.0

A bit more background on Florida:
vetmed.ufl.edu

OK, back to the war--sorry for the diversion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext