That does not mean that all of those who do not get in are undeserving
No, it doesn't mean that. But the point system which is used DOES mean that in some instances, less deserving applicants will be given preference over MORE deserving ones.
I know of no proposals to give space to the undeserving.
That's precisely what this admissions system does, unless one defines "deserving" as those candidates that are African American. It rewards less deserving (i.e., those who have performed less well academically) while leaving out more deserving.
Not only is it unfair, it is not in the public interest. Over time, if all universities adopt similar policy (and many have), you end up providing education to the worst candidates, effectively "dumbing down" society, leaving out the candidates who have the most to offer.
To get into medical school in our state, the number of positions is extremely limited, so you pretty much have to have a 4.0 gradepoint. Suppose the school said, well, if you're black, we'll let you in with a 3.5. Who's interest is served? Over time, what will happen to the "norm" of 3.5?
It really makes no sense. |
