Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG)

MYNG 0.0700

+5.7%

Feb 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GC who wrote (30386)	1/20/2003 11:29:27 PM
From: Fred C. Dobbs	Read Replies (1) of 34075

GC You have a valid point. The first thought I had was as Rod's states, that it was a stress test to see what the plant was capable of producing, but. If normal production of 2000 tons/day is based on an 8 hour day, then in theory, production should have been capable of nearing almost 6000 tons if it used a 24 hour cycle. I guess the main question would be, what is considered a day? Would the plant be capable of sustaining such a level or was it just peddle to the metal to see if they could blow it up. Dragsters are driven full bore, but it's not unusual for them to be rebuilt before each heat. Doubt GE would want to do an overhaul every other day. Biggest problem with "Good Ole Manitoba Gumbo" is you have to stop and scrap it off the shovel. You just can't shovel that chit. Ron

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next