Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (67296)	1/21/2003 1:10:12 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (2) of 281500

I'd say you don't know what you're talking about (beginning with the fact that I'm not a lady). First you say it's "fantastic" to claim there will be any forthcoming evidence Iraq has WMDs: Message 18467407 Then you immediately predict ten years of nuclear devastation, plague, and drought, and post this: >>Kuwait's worst fear is that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein will arm his limited arsenal of missiles with chemical or biological warheads and launch them at oil-related targets in Kuwait. "We are 100 percent sure he has these two weapons," Sheik Ahmed said in a recent interview with The Associated Press.<< Well, conventional weapons don't normally cause nuclear devastation, plague, or drought. So either you believe Saddam has WMDs (Kuwait clearly believes it), or you don't. If you believe he doesn't, then you can't seriously believe he's going to use them. If you believe he does and he will, then there's nothing fantastic about claiming the evidence he has them will probably soon be available...one way or the other. So between the two predictions, I'd say yours is far more fantastic and hysterical.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next