SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (3973)1/22/2003 1:06:28 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) of 7720
 
The argument is similar to noting a difference between accidental homicide, manslaughter, and murder. If, for example, you shot someone in the reasonable belief that he was threatening you, and he died, you would not be prosecuted. If you killed someone in the heat of the moment, without premeditation, you would be charged with manslaughter, and receive a moderate sentence. If you planned the murder, you would get a heavy sentence. None of these things affects the victims' rights to life, but the degree of culpability imputed, and the degree of punishment exacted. Similarly with rape, incest, and threat to the life of the mother: Society may deem these situations so extreme as to choose not to penalize the mother for aborting, not commenting on the rights of the child, but on the culpability of the mother.......
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext