Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (14700)	1/22/2003 4:31:51 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) of 28931

Greg, I say that because I've got no reason to think that "people" (human simian-related animals) exist anywhere *but* Earth. I generally don't think things exist when I don't have some evidence for their existence. To wit, there are practical questions: How old do you look outside time and space? How do you see outside time and space? Are there photons outside time and space? Can I breathe the air? Do you have e. coli? Will I still eat? Does my heart beat? Can God own a Rolex? Last time I checked, all these things reflect the products of cellular processes at work, and there is no reason to think that being "outside time and space" makes any allowance for them, nor would it have any requisite need for them. People without cellular process are people? If you mean time and space as I know it, then the answer is pretty clear : "No, except in a domain called the imaginary - aka "mind", where anything is possible." Final point: Everything evolves, even God. God was once a God without people and he had to wait for people to get his Rolex.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next