SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (4059)1/22/2003 8:10:38 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (2) of 7720
 
<< Since currently no one else can take the responsibility on unfortunately the woman in this case has to ... >>

Not true. Science can remove embryos, freeze them and store them for many years, until another host can be found. The can probably do the same thing with fetuses.

The woman must survive outside the womb, without a host, therefore, the embryo and fetus should be given the same equal opportunity.

By your logic, a woman who is not pregnant would be forced to carry the fetus of another woman, since you believe that women must be forced to bear fetuses that they don't want.

Thus rich women could force poor women to carry their fetuses, or, the government could force white women to bear black fetuses in order to implement integration.

You are suggesting quite a slippery slope.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext