<< The fetus is dependent on the mother until perhaps 8 months. >>
But, if the woman does not want to play host to, whatever that thing is, in her womb, she should not have to. Women are victims of nature, the same as we are, when we are victims of parasites, such as fleas, colds, infections, earthquakes, tornados, etc.
Those women that want to play host, should be allowed to do so, in most cases. Those that don't should be able to safely remove the fetus, or embryo, allowing the fetus to go it own independent way, and allowing the woman to do the same.
<< should the government require every woman who is physically capable of breastfeeding to breast feed her baby >>
My girlfriend calls me her baby, so, I would have to say YES, to this question.
You really can't force a woman to breast feed. It is unenforceable. Implementation truly violates the laws of privacy.
Of course, it would be very easy to get the word out to all mothers of the value of breast feeding.
Buts........ look at the woman who is charged with murder for breast feeding, while taking drugs. How many women don't only not breast feed, but use drugs, smoke, drink, whatever, while they are pregnant. That poor child will be punished for life, with all kinds of defects, both physical and mental.
Not every human being is human. |
