Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: paul_philp who wrote (67905)	1/23/2003 8:05:36 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) of 281500

>>I hope Bush has more than this up his sleeve.<< It's funny how arguments can spin around and hit you from the other side. Someone pointed out yesterday how inconsistent it is to say that we shouldn't attack Iraq because they'd retaliate with WMD. In that same vein, I think it's inconsistent to accuse the US of providing Saddam with WMD and then argue that he doesn't have them. Yesterday I was arguing with Zonder on another thread about whether the US provided Iraq with WMD, when she produced a very long list of nasty technology that the US is supposed to have provided to the Iraqis. Seems to me that it's very inconsistent to wave around a list of WMD we are supposed to have provided to Iraq, and then argue that they don't have any WMD. It would be really ironic if the reason we aren't telling how we know what they have is because they got it from us. Or maybe, we know who they got it from, and it's Germany, France, Russia, Pakistan, China, and other countries that would really rather not be embarrassed in public. Maybe all of the above.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next