SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (67828)1/23/2003 10:53:10 AM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
"So why defend them by implying that they might have destroyed them? Let the new anti-war position be:Saddam entitled to his WMDS OR the Raliens stole the WMDS."

Perhaps you could explain where in my postings I have defended Saddam or the Iraqis(them). As far as I recall the destruction of those WMDs found by the US armed forces and the UN inspectors was done by those groups and not the Iraqis.

Why confuse the issue? Either they have them or they don't.
If the US has information as to the whereabouts of Iraqi WMDs then the US government would be criminal if it did not tell the UN inspectors about them. After all it is the US government that has told the world that Saddam has WMDs.
More over the US government would be guilty of duplicity if the Iraqi WMDs do not exist.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News