SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MSI who wrote (19275)1/25/2003 1:46:39 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) of 93284
 
Re: Another interesting question is the calculated G-forces on both the Pentagon and WTC attacks... anybody know the calcs on those?

What is it you are looking for here? The impact force?

Right after 9/11, there were some interesting facts presented on the FADG thread regarding airliner footprints and the likely penetration of same on a nuclear reactor containment. The fuselage basically crumples, and the only part of an airliner that achieves any penetration of the reinforced concrete shells is the engine rotor, which weights about 12,000 lbs. This however is not capable of penetrating the typical 4.5 feet of thickness of the typical containment structure.

The type of damage on the Pentagon is as you suggest. Completely consistent with damage to be expected from a projectile with a dense nose cone, and completely inconsistent with the damage to be expected from the two engine rotors of a 757 with the fuselage and midsection basically achieving little penetrative force.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext