SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (158903)1/25/2003 2:39:34 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 1580035
 
Please explain why Mr. Pickering seemingly was unconcerned with the 17 year old's lack of a sentence even though he had shot into the couple's home and was the ringleader but instead Mr. Pickering was most concerned that Swan who was not even his client get a sentence that was proportional to the 17 year old's who got off scott free?

Your allegation doesn't comport with the facts. It was Swan who was at trial and not the 17-year old, and Pickering could have had no impact whatsoever on the sentencing of the 17-year old. That said, there is nothing in the record to suggest that Pickering was "unconcerned" about the 17-year old's light sentence; in fact, his entire position was based on the fact that he felt the 17-year old, who was more responsible for the crime, had received a lighter sentence. I'm not sure why you're unclear on this.

Sorry, big guy, but that's all it takes for me to suspect this man and I don't want him sitting on a court of law in this land.

You conveniently fail to respond to my post pointing out his positions that clearly refute the notion of his being "racist".

This is all about politics with the Democrats. ALL POLITICS.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext