SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (12193)1/25/2003 11:00:23 PM
From: portage  Read Replies (4) of 89467
 
Wharfie, there's a simple answer to all of this. Vote the bum out (why anyone voted for him in the first place is a great mystery, and he's only there due to the mischief of Nader and Florida voter registration shenanigans anyway. We're stuck with a little napoleon who lost by 500,000 votes and tells us how things would be so much easier if he could just be the dictator. That anyone but the corporate elites and neo-con hegemonists will vote for him next time around is even more inexplicable).

Americans as a whole are easily pliable, susceptible to smooth sounding nonsense, and disinclined to spend time thinking critically. That is, until their own livelihoods are directly and obviously affected, by forces they often don't understand. Then whomever's in the way gets blamed, and gets taken out by one of the few tools available to the frustrated and frightened masses -- the vote. It's already starting to show up, to those who watch the signs.

This will accelerate by 2004. The domestic and world economy is about to undergo some serious shocks, with or without the imperialistic diversions of Boy George. Incumbency is an advantage, as will be the flush of tax free dividend money that will quite obviously be recycled to a 2004 Bush campaign in significant quantities if that proposal is passed. Regardless, there is an ironically parallel Bush II scenario unfolding here.

This guy is simply the worst and most dangerous leader we've had since Nixon. Dangerous to the world, and dangerous to us. By virtue of the people with whom he surrounds himself, and what he enables them to do. All that's left is for him to become the most corrupt. Jury's still out on that - Nixon has a good head start, heh heh.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext