SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (68825)1/26/2003 4:07:27 AM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
this is NOT acceptable now or ever...U.S. Weighs Tactical Nuclear Strike on Iraq
For what one defense analyst says is a worst-case scenario, planners are studying the use of atomic bombs

I would be very surprised and disappointed if Pentagon planners did not already have detailed plans for the use of our nuclear weapons (and every other weapon in our arsenal) against ALL of our enemies.

Afterall, our President, Congressional leaders and all US Forces members swear to defend us "against all enemies both foreign and domestic". Weapons are the tools we give them to accomplish that job.

Maybe that durn oath of office. Maybe that is the problem. Perhaps we should rewrite it to swear to, "Ignore the first sentence (and what it says about common Defence) and the rest of the Constitution. Maintain peace and tranquility at no cost. Provide fine wine and copious meals to all and promise to keep screwing each other until we are all the same color."

There, that should end the fight thing...once and for all.
uw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News