SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RealMuLan who wrote (69134)1/27/2003 2:12:46 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
. "If there were no “axis of evil” claim, then North Korea would never have felt to be threaten to this degree."

But they broke the 1994 deal in 1998 when clinton was still president. Evil thing to do, no???

"Another proof, in 1976 (?) or so, a vice Premier from the South Korea and his delegation got assassinated in Thailand. Before the action, North Korea informed China, and China disapproved, but North K. did it anyway. So China would never, intentionally, give Nuclear weapons to this kind of “crazy” regime, period. "

By disapproving but not warning SK, china was comlicit. They may not give crazy regime nukes but they may give them the prereqs for building nukes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext