Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (159008)	1/27/2003 4:17:58 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 1580215

If you follow the line of reasoning about the fair thing for Mr. Swan you don't have to conclude anything about the 17 year old. If the 17th year old did shoot a gun in to the house he should have been charged with that offense, but apparently he was not. Either they couldn't get enough evidence (in which case the judge and jury are not supposed to consider it when deciding punishment for the cross burning) or the prosecutor didn't do his job. In fact, Mr. Pickering was so committed to helping D. Swan, he violated another judicial law......ex parte contact.......when asked, he barely remember doing it and blew it off as inconsequential. Mr. Pickering was the judge, I don't think he asked Swan to hire him as a lawyer. He blocked the implementation of the 1965 Civils Right Voting bill for a number of years Delaying or even opposing a civil rights law doesn't mean that you are a racist. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next