SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: paul_philp who wrote (69653)1/28/2003 11:53:15 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Disagree, Paul. Felt that President Bush used exactly the right tone....Going to war is not a "fun and games" project or "compelling", nor is sitting around waiting for the next murdering attack on the US. I believe that he generally outlined the Iraq situation, mentioned Iran (!!!!), and announced Feb 5th as the day Mr. Powell goes to the Security Council.

Saddam can still accept his own 12 year old agreement, and cooperate. It's not too late. But I don't believe that any watching tonight can doubt that it soon will be.

I am disappointed after the State of the Union. The case against Iraq was careful and complete but it was far from compelling. No matter how justified the war, leading America into battle with the country divided along (mostly) partisan lines is bad policy. It is a failure of leadership.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News