Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zonder who wrote (2945)	1/29/2003 4:09:31 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 15987

I don't see anything special about the analysis.. It was pretty accurate.. And the author actually stated that he believed the change in the US nuclear posture review was actually smart since it provided more flexible response and made it a bit more uncertain for America's enemies as to just where the line would be drawn between conventional and nuclear response. Also, Item #6 in his reasons for why the US used nuclear weapons in 1945 is the most compelling.. Any enemy of the US should recognize that, rather than suffering tremendous casualities amongst our soldiers, we'll maintain the option to use nuclear weapons instead... Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next