Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (159288)	1/30/2003 11:59:08 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1584059

Why, then, didn't Bush Sr. take him outwhen he had the chance and no bs.....he definitely had the chance? 1. We had made the commitment, in order to build the strongest possible coalition, to abide by the UN mandate. The argument that we should have "taken saddam out" is among the least informed on the subject. 2. We had not tried containment. 11 years ago, it was totally logical to attempt to contain Saddam. I doubt ANYONE could have known that Clinton would mismanage the situation so badly (even though I knew Clinton was an incompetent before he was elected, I certainly didn't know HOW BAD he would be). This is an excellent example of how strong leadership saves lives. Clinton's mismanagement of the Iraqi situation, ultimately, may cost American and Iraqi lives. Had he not bungled this so badly, containment might still be a viable option, even today. Its difficult to argue this point with you because you only see what you want to see ROTFLMAO.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next