Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.82

+1.5%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Hull who wrote (172684)	1/30/2003 10:12:34 PM
From: carl a. mehr	Read Replies (1) of 186894

John, Has the cat got your tongue? I see that lawyer Dunlap exercised 192,000 shares of Intel at $5.71 a share on 2002-01-18 and 192,000 shares of Intel at $4.195 a share on 2001-04-20. These same shares were sold the same day that they were exercised. On 2002-01-18 they brought $33.87 per share and on 2001-04-20 they brought $31.939 per share. For holding 384,000 shares of Intel for less than a day, the brilliant attorney for Intel Thomas F. Dunlap collected $10,733,567 This money was gleefully contributed from Intel share holders earnings by re-purchasing Intel shares on the open market. For now allow me to ask you: Besides paying a common lawyer a fabulous yearly salary it is strange that the Intel shareholders should give Mr. Dunlop $10,733,567 from the meager Intel share holder earnings. If a non-technical person like Dunlop gets this kind of a bonus, then certainly Paul Engel and Tim May and people near Amy J. must have received bonuses far greater, would you not think that to be the case? Maybe I got it all wrong. As a non-technical person your "stock option" shares are probably in the same league as the attorney? Your answer please...humble carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next