PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cosmicforce who wrote (351122)	1/31/2003 4:16:45 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 769670

Good job on your classifications. I agree with your analysis. However, I think you underestimate the potential of a Saddam unchained. He is a dictatorial, and tyrannical oppressor, that appears motivated to dominate as much of the planet as he is able. His neighbors in the past have checked him when things appeared to be getting out of hand. He has a history of annialating dissidents. Many Iraqis have emmigrated to the three countries you mentioned. He has the potential and demonstrated desire, if left on his own, to capture the oil economy of the world and use it to dominate or rule the regions around him. Many countries on the Eastern Hemisphere have become economically entangled/dependant on the west. That IMO is what keeps countries like Egypt from forming any kind of alliance with him. That and they know they can't trust him. The world continues to shrink and politics continue to merge, making it no longer necessary to physically occupy another country to establish control over it. I see Saddam as a cowboy bent on domination. So do the leaders of Middle Eastern countries. Otherwise, he would probably get support from them. I see no other option than forceably removing him from power.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next