Tom, I have represented myself very honestly and I am sorry you just don't buy it. I have 17 years in the industry, the last 6 as CIO. I hold 3000 shares at 10.5 (I waited too long to jump in!) Are you in? REALLY IN? When you say you are provable, what do you mean? When you say Mr. Freeny and yourself sweated for this patent, please eloborate. Where you in on it's development? If so, please share it with us, it may give us insight. My research has shown that the patent examiner may have been very light on Mr. Freeny, and that the defendants will use that. That only four claims were removed during the initial review and it was approved shortly thereafter, very unusual. Can you sunstantiate that?
Like most on this thread, you have misunderstood that "glorified" post. I only wrote the first paragraph. The rest was pasted in from another source. I was simply troubled by it's content and posted it to Mel (Who I respect), for his opinion. And if you re-read it, I also asked him to pass it by his patent attorney friend, who I really wanted to hear from. It's content did not express any of my opinions, I was simply sharing my research. Yea, I admit I am not a "cheerleader" like some on this thread, I am used to trying to "poke holes" in ideas, until they are proven to me. That is a large part of my job. Tell me Tom, if you had turned up some information, a tactic that might very well be used in court, would you have shared it with us? Or would you have just used it for yourself? I'd like to hear what exactly you would have done if you were in my shoes. Please, if I can be told of a better way I could have handled this delicate situation, I would be very appreciative. Sincerely - David. |
