>>>dufus,<<<<
Vitas, it's my opinion you should treat your debate opponent with respect. Calling folks "dufus" or "retarded" or whatever serves to minimize any opinion that would find its way to your position.
>>>why don't you tell us why Saddam is exempt from complying with United Nations Resolution 1441<<<
He's not exempt. The inspections are in process. And I remind you that these inspections don't exist only for the convenience of the United States, but rather they exist for the United Nations as a whole.
>>>and why the citizens of the United States of America should continue to run the risk of another attack while Saddam is in non compliance<<<
First, Iraq did not and has never attacked the United States of America. If you truly believe this, please indicate time date and place and who specifically was behind the attack on American citizens.
Secondly, citizens of the United States of America really do "run the risk" from a first attack from Iraq should Bush pull the war trigger; whereas, presently they don't.
Vitas, ask any expert. Terrorism attacks in America are more likely to come from OBL, and ringwing extremists; not Iraq.
>>>Bush has successfully made a previous back-burner issue the one with the fat in the fire, regardless of the near unanimous opinion of the rest of the world that, while Iraq may be "a" problem, it is just one of several.<<<
laweekly.com
Vitas, could you please stop and consider for a moment that perhaps you're wrong; and that most of the people are right? At least on this issue--lol! |
