SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Oral Roberts who wrote (65124)2/2/2003 1:01:52 PM
From: James F. Hopkins  Read Replies (1) of 209892
 
Your right at least in part, I thought of that before
I posted the other post but I wanted to make a point.,
however at 2000mph ( could have been 3000) even over the short distance between the tank and the wing I doubt the difference in speed could have been much less than a 300mph impact, and up to 1000mph. but that is just a guess.
---
There would have been a substanual difference between
Ice and Foam due to density..the ice would have more
density and not slowed down as fast, ( hence impact
speed would have been less but likely caused more
damage )
From the tape I saw I don't think the shutter speed
of the camera was fast enough to get enough
resolution to tell if it was ice or foam.
The camera would have had to have a super fast shutter speed, to make a determination.
Jim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News